e-book Debating race, ethnicity, and Latino identity : Jorge J.E. Gracia and his critics

Free download. Book file PDF easily for everyone and every device. You can download and read online Debating race, ethnicity, and Latino identity : Jorge J.E. Gracia and his critics file PDF Book only if you are registered here. And also you can download or read online all Book PDF file that related with Debating race, ethnicity, and Latino identity : Jorge J.E. Gracia and his critics book. Happy reading Debating race, ethnicity, and Latino identity : Jorge J.E. Gracia and his critics Bookeveryone. Download file Free Book PDF Debating race, ethnicity, and Latino identity : Jorge J.E. Gracia and his critics at Complete PDF Library. This Book have some digital formats such us :paperbook, ebook, kindle, epub, fb2 and another formats. Here is The CompletePDF Book Library. It's free to register here to get Book file PDF Debating race, ethnicity, and Latino identity : Jorge J.E. Gracia and his critics Pocket Guide.

This panic may be muted by the discourse of colorblindness and post-racialism, but finds voice in these 'hybrid' significations of Obama. Cynthia D. Jorge J. Gracia , Samuel P. Each essay carefully and clearly presents the views of key authors in their historical and philosophical context and provides brief biographical sketches and reading lists, as aids to students and other readers.

The discussion of race in the United States reflects to a great extent the situation in the country. The adoption of the one-drop rule , according to which anyone who has a drop of black blood is considered black, has too often been taken for granted, resulting in a polarization that characterizes both the formulation of problems related to race and the purported solutions to those problems: a person is either black or white but not both; there is no in between.

It also has tended to move to the background the visible dimensions of race and to pay undue attention to biological and genetic conceptions of it; heredity, rather than appearance, has often been regarded as most significant. Finally, it has contributed to the widespread use of the metaphor of purity associated with whites and of impurity associated with blacks: to be white is to be uncontaminated, whereas to be black is to be contaminated.

That a mixture is generally different from the elements that compose it but partakes of them, that races involve gradation and fuzzy boundaries, and that visible appearance plays an important role in racial classifications are facts too often neglected. This model of race takes insufficient note of what much of the world thinks and illustrates the insularity that characterizes some segments of the U. Indeed, it is seldom that proper attention is paid to the views of other societies.

Although the views on race of some European philosophers, such as Kant and Hume, have been studied in some detail, treatments by Latin Americans or Africans, for example, are generally ignored by North American philosophers concerned with race. The inadequacy of this parochial approach becomes clear when one considers how conceptions of race vary from place to place. In Cuba, for example, to be black entails a certain kind of appearance. A person who appears to have mixed black-white ancestry is not usually considered black or white but mulatto.

In the United States, according to the one-drop rule, to be black requires only one black ancestor, even if physical appearance tells another story. But in Cuba persons of mixed black and white ancestry who look white are generally taken as white, whereas those who appear black are considered black.

Philosophy of Liberation (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)

Clearly the criteria of racial classification used in the United States and Cuba are different. Similar differences can be found between the views of race in the United States and elsewhere in the world. This neglect of points of view in other parts of the world also applies to ethnicity and nationality.

Societies differ substantially in how they establish and think about ethnicity or nationality. Some societies use skin color and physical appearance to establish ethnic and national distinctions; others use lineage or culture. Indian is a racial term generally associated with ancestry in the United States, but in some contexts in South America it is used to refer to culture: to be an Indian indicates that one has not adopted the ways of Europeans, thus carrying with it the disparaging connotations that this entails in the eyes of those who are European or have adopted European culture.

Nationality is taken in some cases to be a legal marker—whether involving birthplace or ancestry—and in others to be an indicator of kinship, race, or culture. As in the United States, in some parts of Latin America blacks and mulattoes were denied citizenship because of their race or racial mixture, whereas in other parts of that region it was denied on other grounds, including culture.

Considering these differences in conception, it would seem to make sense that theories of race, ethnicity, and nationality need to take into account as many of the various ways in which different societies use these notions as possible. But the tendency in the United States has been to concentrate on Western European views.

This has resulted in inadequate theories, based on cultural and social biases.

K. Anthony Appiah

Latin America is especially important because it is the place where Africans, Amerindians, and Europeans first came together in substantial numbers. Indeed, some scholars have made the argument that the concept of race in particular developed in the context of the encounters between these peoples in the sixteenth century.

The details of the story have still to be worked out, but one thing is clear: Latin America is significant in this development. And the significance is not restricted to the fact that Latin America is a meeting place of Europeans, Amerindians, and Africans; it involves also the complex subsequent history of racial, ethnic, and national mixture in the region. Scholars who have studied the pertinent populations do not tire of repeating that Latin America is one of the places in the world where mixing has been most prevalent…. Read the Preface and Chapter 1 here.

The Philosophy of Race. Routledge 1, pages Hardback: Since at least the early s, philosophical race theory has emerged as a dynamic and fertile area of serious scholarly inquiry, and this new four-volume Major Work from Routledge meets the need for a comprehensive collection to facilitate ready access to the most influential and important foundational and cutting-edge scholarship. Race is an inherently contextual phenomenon and some of the material gathered in this volume—in particular, that exploring racialization in Japan, Brazil, and Norway—provides a refreshing counterweight to the philosophical zeal for abstraction.

The Philosophy of Race is edited by Paul C. Taylor, a leading scholar in the field. The collection is fully indexed and has a comprehensive introduction, newly written by the editor, which places the material in its intellectual and historic context. It is an essential work of reference and is destined to be valued by scholars and students as a vital one-stop research resource. Comments Off on The Philosophy of Race. Toward a Philosophy of Race in Education. There is a tendency in education theory to place the focus on the consequences of racial hegemony racism, Eurocentric education, low performance by racial minorities and ignore that race is antecedent to these consequences.

This dissertation explores the treatment of race within critical theory in education. I conduct a metaphysical analysis to examine the race concept as it emerges from the works of various critical theorists in education. Each section deals with one work and focuses on three sets of issues: first, how race, ethnicity, and nationality are conceptualized and the value of philosophical inquiry on these topics; second, the conceptualization of Hispanic and Latino identity and the implications of that conception; third, the meaning of Latino philosophy and who is included and how Latino philosophy relates to American philosophy.

Anthony Appiah, Richard Bernstein, and Susana Nuccetelli, along with philosophers from Madrid and Argentina and cultural studies scholars. They provide concise, insightful criticisms of Gracia's work, and in return Gracia provides extensive, enlightening responses to each commentator. This book is pluralistic and rich with provocative claims and valuable insights about difficult and thorny issues. Summing Up: Highly recommended.


Upper-division undergraduates through faculty. Kegley, California State University, Bakersfield. Log In. My Account. Sheldon St.

Remember to clear the cache and close the browser window. Search For:. Advanced Search.

Select an Action. Debating race, ethnicity, and Latino identity Jorge J. Gracia and his critics. Publication Information:. Physical Description:. Local Note:.

Race, Ethnicity, Nationality, and Philosophy

Electronic reproduction. Available via World Wide Web. Access may be limited to ProQuest affiliated libraries. Personal Subject:. Gracia, Jorge J.

Subject Term:. Hispanic Americans -- Ethnic identity. Hispanic Americans -- Race identity. Latin Americans -- Ethnic identity.

Follow the APA Blog on Social Media

Latin Americans -- Race identity. Ethnicity -- Philosophy. Race -- Philosophy.

  • Kidnapping. An Investigators Guide.
  • Main Library Hours:.
  • Hispanic and Latino Heritage Month.
  • Jorge J. E. Gracia and His Critics.
  • Hispanic and Latino Heritage Month | Central Michigan University.
  • Featured channels.